<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Snark Food &#187; michelle obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snarkfood.com/tag/michelle-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snarkfood.com</link>
	<description>Daily Gossip to feed your inner snark...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:45:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama PETA Ad Not Approved by First Lady</title>
		<link>http://snarkfood.com/michelle-obama-peta-ad-not-approved-by-first-lady/36402/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkfood.com/michelle-obama-peta-ad-not-approved-by-first-lady/36402/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Vess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrie underwood peta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fur-free and fabulous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama peta ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama peta advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oprah peta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oprah winfrey peta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people for the ethical treatment of animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peta michelle obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyra banks peta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkfood.com/?p=6402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Animal rights organization PETA is in some trouble with the White House for using an image of First Lady Michelle Obama in one of their advertisements without her approval. The 'Fur-Free and Fabulous!' ad features Michelle Obama alongside Oprah Winfrey, Carrie Underwood and Tyra Banks. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Animal rights organization PETA is in some trouble with the White House for using an image of First Lady <strong>Michelle Obama</strong> in one of their advertisements without her approval. The &#8216;Fur-Free and Fabulous!&#8217; ad features Michelle Obama alongside <strong>Oprah Winfrey</strong>, <strong>Carrie Underwood</strong> and <strong>Tyra Banks</strong>. All of the women have publicly shunned the wearing of fur, but it seems the organization didn&#8217;t bother to ask if the ladies wanted to be spokesmodels for the PETA cause.</p>
<div id="attachment_6403" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://snarkfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Michelle-Obama-PETA-Ad.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-6403" title="Michelle Obama PETA Ad" src="http://snarkfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Michelle-Obama-PETA-Ad.jpg" alt="Michelle Obama PETA Ad" width="400" height="421" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Michelle Obama PETA Ad</p></div>
<p>The White House released a statement saying that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has no authority or right to use the image of Michelle Obama in any of their advertisements. Obama&#8217;s press secretary did confirm the First Lady &#8220;does not wear fur&#8221; but said she did not consent to have her image used in PETA&#8217;s anti-fur campaign.</p>
<p>In a response statement, PETA said the organization has not &#8220;asked the White House to fund or promote the campaign, as they can&#8217;t do such things. However, the organization claims no wrongdoing in using the First Lady&#8217;s image to promote their cause. &#8220;The fact is that Michelle Obama has issued a statement indicating that she doesn&#8217;t wear fur, and the world should know that in PETA&#8217;s eyes, that makes her pretty fabulous.&#8221;</p>
<p>We think PETA is pretty fabulously ballsy for using Michelle Obama&#8217;s image to promote their campaign without her permission. And even worse, they put her behind Oprah Winfrey in the ad! Isn&#8217;t that kind of like saying Oprah is cooler than President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s wife? We&#8217;re not touching that one.</p>
<p><strong>&gt;&gt; Previously:  </strong><a title="Permanent Link to Joanna Krupa Defends Religious Nude PETA Ad" rel="bookmark" href="http://snarkfood.com/joanna-krupa-defends-religious-nude-peta-ad/35968/"><strong>Joanna Krupa Defends Religious Nude PETA Ad</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkfood.com/michelle-obama-peta-ad-not-approved-by-first-lady/36402/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimes Against Fashion: Michelle Obama Edition</title>
		<link>http://snarkfood.com/crimes-against-fashion-michelle-obama-edition/33665/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkfood.com/crimes-against-fashion-michelle-obama-edition/33665/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Snarkista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimes against fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama clown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama clown outfit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama fashion flops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama london outfit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkfood.com/?p=3665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rarely is Snarkista speechless, but today she&#8217;s pretty damn close. Behold Michelle Obama in London, one of the fashion capitols of the world. Unfortunately, Miss Thang appears to have run through the notions department at Fabrics-R-Us following a vicious glue-gun fight. &#8220;But,&#8221; you may say, &#8220;perhaps she was visiting Piccadilly Circus, and was tripped up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://snarkfood.com/crimes-against-fashion-michelle-obama-edition/michelle-obama-crimes-against-fashion/" rel="attachment wp-att-3666"><img src="http://snarkfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/michelle-obama-crimes-against-fashion.jpg" alt="michelle-obama-crimes-against-fashion" title="michelle-obama-crimes-against-fashion" width="306" height="605" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3666" /></a></p>
<p>Rarely is Snarkista speechless, but today she&#8217;s pretty damn close.  Behold <strong>Michelle Obama</strong> in London, one of the fashion capitols of the world.  Unfortunately, Miss Thang appears to have run through the notions department at Fabrics-R-Us following a vicious glue-gun fight.</p>
<p>&#8220;But,&#8221; you may say, &#8220;perhaps she was visiting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piccadilly_Circus">Piccadilly Circus</a>, and was tripped up by the &#8216;circus&#8217; part?&#8221;  No&#8230; sadly, this was Michelle&#8217;s pick to visit <a href="http://www.westminster-abbey.org/">Westminster Abbey</a>.  Nothing says &#8220;reverence&#8221; like an homage to Bozo.  </p>
<p>This getup makes the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2008/11/who-designed-mi.html">&#8220;black widow&#8221; election-night dress </a>look positively <em>regal</em>.  For those of you still hanging on to those &#8220;Jackie-O&#8221; comparisons, you may now let go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkfood.com/crimes-against-fashion-michelle-obama-edition/33665/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Michelle Obama Make A Baby Announcement Tonight?</title>
		<link>http://snarkfood.com/will-michelle-obama-make-a-baby-announcement-tonight/3799/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkfood.com/will-michelle-obama-make-a-baby-announcement-tonight/3799/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Snarkista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat national convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkfood.com/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speculation is keen today that Michelle Obama is pregnant. Rush Limbaugh speculated on the topic this morning on his show&#8230;and wondered if Michelle may make an announcement during her speech tonight at the Democrats&#8217; National Convention. The pic on the left shows Michelle in March, the pic on the right is from yesterday. She&#8217;s definitely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href='http://snarkfood.com/will-michelle-obama-make-a-baby-announcement-tonight/3799/michelle-obama-prepreggers/' title='michelle-obama-prepreggers'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://snarkfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/michelle-obama-prepreggers-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="michelle-obama-prepreggers" title="michelle-obama-prepreggers" /></a>
<a href='http://snarkfood.com/will-michelle-obama-make-a-baby-announcement-tonight/3799/michelle-obama-preggers/' title='michelle-obama-preggers'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://snarkfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/michelle-obama-preggers-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="michelle-obama-preggers" title="michelle-obama-preggers" /></a>
<br />
Speculation is keen today that <strong>Michelle Obama </strong>is pregnant.  <strong>Rush Limbaugh </strong>speculated on the topic this morning on his show&#8230;and wondered if Michelle may make an announcement during her speech tonight at the Democrats&#8217; National Convention.  The pic on the left shows Michelle in March,  the pic on the right is from yesterday.  She&#8217;s <em>definitely </em>put on some pounds.</p>
<p><br/>Snarkista wonders if Michelle would really make such a spectacle of her speech, even if she IS pregnant.  Still, if you subscribe to the &#8220;all press is good press&#8221; school of thought,  it certainly would be front-page news.  She definitely needs to make people forget some of her controversial remarks of the past, and a preggers announcement would certainly divert some attention!  She WILL be making the case for &#8220;her man&#8221; tonight, and if her man&#8217;s been gettin busy, it would probably reinforce his family-man image.  It would also highlight the fact that John and Cindy McCain are too old to be makin&#8217; babies.  One thing&#8217;s for sure, <a href="http://snarkfood.com/politicians/">she won&#8217;t be talking about Obama&#8217;s birth certificate.</a> Stay tuned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkfood.com/will-michelle-obama-make-a-baby-announcement-tonight/3799/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cover Crimes:  Barack Obama Edition</title>
		<link>http://snarkfood.com/cover-crimes-barack-obama-edition/3397/</link>
		<comments>http://snarkfood.com/cover-crimes-barack-obama-edition/3397/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Snarkista</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snarkfood.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upcoming issue of the New Yorker, the July 21st issue, has a picture of Barack Obama, depicting him and wife Michelle on the cover. It shows Michelle with an Afro and an AK 47. and the two of them doing the fist bump. Barack is looking quite Middle Eastern, and is sporting some kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://snarkfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/obama-new-yorker-cover2.jpg" alt="" title="obama new yorker cover2" width="240" height="353" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-405" /><br />
The upcoming issue of the New Yorker, the July 21st issue, has a picture of Barack Obama, depicting him and wife Michelle on the cover. It shows Michelle with an Afro and an AK 47. and the two of them doing the fist bump.  Barack is looking quite Middle Eastern, and is sporting some kind of turban-type thing on his head! Osama Bin Laden&#8217;s over the mantle, and the American flag is burning in the fireplace.</p>
<p><em>Politico</em> reports that Barack, when told of the upcoming issue said:</p>
<blockquote><p> “I have no response to that.” </p></blockquote>
<p> But Michelle&#8217;s stylists will!</p>
<p>The magazine explains at the start of its news release previewing the issue: “On the cover of the July 21, 2008, issue of the The New Yorker, in ‘The Politics of Fear,’ artist Barry Blitt satirizes the use of scare tactics and misinformation in the Presidential election to derail Barack Obama’s campaign.”</p>
<p>I’m sure Senator Obama is THRILLED for The New Yorker’s help!  Snarkista imagines the satiric New Yorker will be great fodder for fearmongers who will take it quite seriously.  The Obama girls, however will be PISSED and are probably shooting a response video right now.  Don&#8217;t cross those Obama girls, &#8216;cuz they will cut a bitch.  With LIPGLOSS.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://snarkfood.com/cover-crimes-barack-obama-edition/3397/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

